Jamaica is Third on the ‘Happiness’ Index

The Happy Planet Index 2.0 is out. From the website:

The HPI is an innovative measure that shows the ecological efficiency with which human well-being is delivered around the world. It is the first ever index to combine environmental impact with well-being to measure the environmental efficiency with which country by country, people live long and happy lives.

The Index doesn’t reveal the ‘happiest’ country in the world. It shows the relative efficiency with which nations convert the planet’s natural resources into long and happy lives for their citizens.

The report raises three main issues that interest me. First, Jamaica scores very highly on the index. It is good to see some positive news about Jamaica. Moreover, the news is based on some actual analysis and not the same recycled, exhausted news you see about the island in the international media. As the excerpt below posits, Jamaica’s story cannot be reduced to rights violations and poverty. More on that later.

Second, there is a serious attempt to grapple with the empirics of something as fuzzy, but essential, as the relationship between the environment and happiness. This is a refreshing application. Continue reading

Jamaica & the IMF. Redux.

Messrs. Strauss-Kahn and Golding courtesy of The International Monetary Fund.

The history IMF’s involvement in Jamaica is a painful one. Past encounters between the IMF and Jamaica have much to teach us, and them. This tortured relationship has been explored in numerous mediums. Aid and Power is quite a good book on the subject. Moreover, if you watch one documentary on Jamaica, make it Life and Debt.

The return to the IMF must be apart of a broader economic restructuring process. This process should address fundamental issues such as our unsustainable debt to GDP ratio and the fact that the public sector wage bill is about one-fifth of our budget. The only way to achieve this is through shared sacrifice. Developing an inclusive and robust ‘social partnership’ can be the vehicle for achieving this shared sacrifice. At the heart of this partnership should be a broad-based working group to develop a reform scenario and specify the policy changes needed to achieve it. Partners in this arrangement make decisions jointly, as opposed to informing each other of decisions after the fact. A review mechanism for assessing the effectiveness of implementation and to receive feedback from partners should also be agreed.

However, for us to pursue this path we must recognise that government alone cannot make these profound changes. The opposition will have to be involved, and committed. The public is also yet to learn about the nature and extent of private sector involvement in preparing our request for assistance from the Fund. To enable such a change, the government would have to change its modus operandi. Whether it is negotiating with unions or the number of cases of swine flu, secrecy and rumors of secrecy, are badly draining the goodwill of the electorate towards Mr. Golding’s government. Continue reading